Project structure in Plane

The intended division of labour between the two tools: Plane manages responsibility, deadlines, decisions and deliverables. The wiki stores the reviewed knowledge and the reasoning behind each project.

The projects

Plane projectFirst deliverableWiki connection
Precision Psychiatry WorkshopProgramme, source package, panel questions, participants, and decision recordCapability and partnership map, workshop programme
Speech Gap BPD trend studyReconfirmed exploratory longitudinal protocol and planned registration / Stage 1 materials; sample size and duration require study-lead confirmationLongitudinal measurement, clinical references, PCI RR
Speech Gap software rebuilding with novel tools and extensionVersioned specification and implementation plan for separating speech, silence, filled pauses, respiration and uncertain intervalsRespiratory signal extension, temporal parameters, data governance
Camera-based or multimodal therapy follow-upOpportunity note only, potentially in BPD or schizophrenia; no agreed planMultimodal behaviour analysis
Ecosystem and fundingData sites, partner commitments, MILAB-style programme, Richter connection, funding fitEcosystem map, funding landscape
Reuse of earlier multimodal dataEducational-video inventory and pilot, MeMo follow-up, benchmark experienceAdaptive assessment, datasets

Why the split matters

Keeping decisions in Plane and reasoning in the wiki prevents two common failures: a task tracker that slowly fills with undocumented rationale nobody can reconstruct, and a wiki that drifts into being a stale to-do list. Each tool holds what it is good at.

In the framing used in the source correspondence, the wiki is the “what” system and Plane is the “how” and “when” system.

What the workshop is expected to settle

Which data collection can be joined, what the shared minimum measurement is, who owns clinical and technical responsibilities, what the next fundable result is, and which claims are ready for public use.

Ecosystem map · INNOFAIR workshop programme · Programme opportunities · Collaboration process