Editorial safeguards
Hard constraints for every page in this wiki. Carried over from the source review material. Any page touching these topics must respect the wording below rather than a looser paraphrase. When in doubt, use the source’s own hedged sentence.
1. Inventorship and authorship
András Lőrincz is not a named inventor on the Speech Gap patents (WO2020128542A1 / US12161481B2). The named inventors are Gábor Gosztolya, Ildikó Hoffmann, János Kálmán, Magdolna Pákáski, László Tóth, and Veronika Vincze. Original assignee: University of Szeged, with a 2025 partial transfer to SZTE TTC Zrt.
The wiki may mention Lőrincz’s patent-oriented development activity at a general level only, based on his own account. It must not expose a detailed personal patent list, and must not imply he is an inventor of the Speech Gap patent family. Keep scientific authorship, patent inventorship, ownership, and participation in technology development as four separate things.
2. Argus Cognitive
Argus Cognitive, Ltd. is not an ELTE spin-off. Many of its researchers previously worked at ELTE, which constitutes a working connection, not a corporate one. Never upgrade this phrasing to “spin-off,” “partnership,” or “affiliate.”
3. DFKI collaboration
Historical joint work only. It does not establish DFKI’s commitment to the Precision Psychiatry programme. The 2014-era tools (LabelMovie, the AAC symbol recommender) are not claimed to be maintained or clinically deployable today. A present-day implementation would require its own capability, licensing, security, and governance review.
4. MILAB
Implementation period 20 September 2021 to 28 February 2026; project closed. Cite strictly as an organisational model, never as an open or ongoing programme.
5. Autism and behaviour-analysis publications
- Event-detection performance in the ADOS-2 study is not the diagnostic accuracy of an automated autism test.
- The Autism Palette is a theoretical cognitive framework, not a validated diagnostic model.
- Perceived-personality results (ELEA and related datasets) concern collaborative group performance in one dataset. They are not diagnosis, not psychotherapy outcome, and not a measure of a person’s true personality.
- The omnigenic/gene-network work supports a systems-biology dimension; it is not an individual clinical prediction tool.
6. Rehabilitation (AIRS)
Demonstrates interactive and avatar-feedback capability. Does not establish psychiatric treatment efficacy.
7. Speech Gap
Framed as an exploratory, longitudinal, within-person measurement direction — not a stand-alone diagnostic tool. Prospective validation against repeated clinical reference assessments is still pending. Licensing terms must not be inferred or stated beyond the assignee record above.
8. Children’s data
No raw video of children in the public wiki. Aggregate findings and dataset descriptions only. Applies in particular to the 2013 educational-games archive.
9. Grant end date
The VSMT grant’s 31 December 2029 figure is the maximum-duration implication of the call terms (1 January 2026 start, 48-month maximum), not a confirmed contractual end date. Flag this wherever a specific date is published.
10. Danish registers
Large Danish registers do not necessarily contain repeated speech recordings, and a research relationship does not itself grant data access. Access, data type, analysis location, approvals, and new-measurement requirements remain to be determined per project.
11. Capability maturity
Capability maturity varies widely across the portfolio, from public repository to “research prototype, code not verified.” No table of capabilities may be presented as a single validated product suite. The per-row evidence pointer is what establishes readiness; it stays visible.
12. General rule on qualifiers
Anywhere a source uses “must not imply,” “is not evidence of,” “should not be inferred,” or “not independently confirmed,” carry that qualifier into the wiki sentence itself. Do not drop it for smoother prose.
Page weighting
Prominence is deliberately unequal. This tiering governs page length, placement, and whether a collaborator gets a dedicated page at all.
| Tier | Meaning | Members |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Hub | The informatics and AI centre every other technical capability originates from or passes through | NIPG / ELTE |
| 2 — Core working partners | Active, named, funded or contractual substance | Semmelweis / VIKOTE, Speech Gap, Argus Cognitive |
| 3 — Strategic partners | Real and important, at opportunity or relationship stage | Michael Benros / Denmark, Erik Szabó / White Unicorn |
| 4 — Supporting evidence | Historical or one-off collaborations supporting NIPG’s credibility; no dedicated page of their own | Sorbonne, Delft/MeMo, DFKI, Richter/Colleyeder |